I have no conclusion
I just thought it would be interesting to start the conversation and hear from each of you SM devotees (oh, how social media of me!).
They didn’t call your baby ugly
This was sparked by an excellent post by Ines. There were several fantastic responses, and some interesting reactions where folks seemed put off that someone dared to call BS on SM activities and predicting it will die out as a fad. To the point of questioning the intelligence of the person with the opinion.
I recall another post questioning broad stroke advice on SM that got some interesting feedback. But, opinions are like noses. Everyone’s got one.
I’m not saying I agree with the author of the article Ines sited. In fact, I think it’s reckless for anyone to make broad sweeping absolute statements, particularly with no data. Again, opinions and noses.
One hypothesis
Do SM devotees feel almost part of a cult? Not a cult as in “The Hale-Bopp comet is coming, grab your Nikes, put your money in your pocket, eat the pudding and wash it down with vodka” type of cult.
Instead the sort of cult that is purposefully and specifically built by brands, such as Apple or Harley Davidson (I wrote a post about it here) – that makes people believe they are part of a small tribe with a unique common dominator the masses just don’t possess. AKA – the “cool kids club”.
For now, I’m neutral. Since there does not yet exist any absolute hard data that proves to me that it’s a highly impactful tool for agents. Before you kill the messenger with that statement, continue reading.
What I mean is hardcore analytics. Not “I got three listings from FaceBook in the last six weeks”. While that’s certainly a measurable output, it doesn’t take all necessary contributing factors into account when measuring success to an agent.
For example, per Heather Rankin’s comment in Ines’ post, it sounds like she’s got a corner on her local market (yay, Heather) so the density of population and agent SM users could be a factor and measure.
Having said that, nor is there any data to the contrary – that it’s ineffective, or less effective than other measures. So, I’m neutral.
A second hypothesis
Read the rest of this post here



HAMP, HARP, TARP, TAMP, H4H …. If you think they all seem to do the same thing, you’re not too far off. Here’s a little decoding: 


I attended a number of sessions at Inman last week, and one titled Agent 2.0 stood out as offering some interesting ideas for agents to manage their day-to-day business.